https://www.selleckchem.com/MEK.html
ighly accurate geometry and linear attenuation coefficient vs. those of the LLNL phantom. The difference in CT number was ± 2% HU for the LLNL phantom and ± 4% HU for the human CT image based on a CT examination conducted using the chest CT protocol. Moreover, both lungs weighed 734 g to 1,246 g, within the range of the reference value of the ICRU report. These results demonstrate that a new lung model based on average linear dimension measurement in a group with average physique simulated the features and physical properties of real human lungs and