https://www.selleckchem.com/products/bay-876.html
Although the specificities of the diagnosis in clinical features were similar by the diagnostic tests, the sensitivities of postG, periG, TRD, RF, and VS using UWF-SLO were 100%, 100%, 66.7%, 95%, and 81.8%, respectively, which were significantly higher those of CFP (72.2%, 31.3%, 11.1%, 55%, and 48.5%). Additionally, the extent of vitreous haze was milder graded by UWF-SLO compared to CFP (p = 0.0099). The diagnostic ability of UWF-SLO was superior to CFP using clinical examination as gold standard for the ascertainment of the characte