https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/stat3-in-1.ht
83 vs. AUC .64; 95%CI .6-.68; p = .001) and FMF chart (AUC .81 95% CI .77-.85 vs. AUC .64; 95%CI .6-.68; p = .001) were more accurate than Hadlock. The FMF and NICHD had higher sensitivity (77.2 vs. 72.4 vs. 30.1%) but Hadlock had higher specificity for LGA (97.5 vs. 88.5 vs. 85.4%). All standards were poor predictors for adverse neonatal outcomes. The NICHD and the FMF standards may increase the detection rate of LGA in comparison to the Hadlock chart. However, this may increase obstetrical interventions. The NICHD and the