How FC 26 Can Improve the System

It’s not enough to FC 26 Coins simply bring the feature back—it must evolve. In FC 26, budget increase requests should be part of a dynamic negotiation system. Players could choose specific reasons for the request:

    Injury crisis

    Title challenge

    European qualification

    Selling a key player and needing a replacement

Each scenario could have different levels of board receptiveness, influenced by trust in the manager, club finances, and prior performance.

Additionally, EA Sports could implement a risk/reward mechanic. If you promise to reach the Champions League and fail, maybe your job security takes a hit. Or if you succeed, the board increases your influence, giving you greater control in the future. This could lead to interesting managerial arcs, where each choice shapes your long-term story.
Preventing Exploits with Smart AI

One concern with reintroducing budget requests is the potential for abuse. In earlier versions, it was sometimes too easy to secure large amounts of money with little consequence. In FC 26, AI needs to be smarter. The board should remember broken promises and reduce trust in the manager accordingly. Clubs with tight finances or financial fair play concerns should be less willing to spend. The idea is to make money feel earned, not granted.

This system could also tie into board objectives, a current Career Mode feature that often feels disconnected from gameplay. Instead of having rigid goals, FC 26 could allow players to negotiate objectives in return for increased support—mirroring the give-and-take of real football management.

Bringing back budget increase requests could breathe new life into FC 26’s Manager Career Mode. It’s a small change on paper, but its impact on realism and player agency would be massive. With Football Manager 25 gone, EA has a rare opportunity to capture fans seeking tactical depth and immersive management. Starting with thoughtful features like this one would go buy EA FC 26 Coins a long way.