ADHD is Not an illness, and Ritalin is Not a cure.

コメント · 196 ビュー

Are the symptoms of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), which is the most commonly used neuropsychiatric term in the early years, a valid medical condition?

buy ritalin online

Are the symptoms of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), which is the most commonly used neuropsychiatric term in the early years, a valid medical condition? Are we truly referring to the millions of kids who are diagnosed with ADHD as suffering from "diabetes of psychosis," which is a long-lasting and potentially harmful condition of the body that requires regular treatment by utilizing powerful psychoactive drugs? In response to previous criticisms, the thorough, sophisticated, and mostly bold book tackles these issues with a step-by-step refutation of the scientific consensus on ADHD and the first-line treatment of stimulant drugs.

While maintaining the rigor of science, the text is written in a simple, fluid, imaginative, and creative manner, utilizing colorful instances—some humorous and some sad—that captivate the reader off their feet and encourage social transformation. The book brings together the major critiques into a single source, reveals a wealth of evidence to support the effectiveness as well as the safety and efficacy of stimulant medication, and proposes the best solutions to this raging social-educational issue. However, this book outlines a myriad of validity and reliability issues in the biomedical consensus. It exposes multiple biases and non-parsimonious bandages (unjustified rationalizations) aimed at hiding the scientific holes of the consensus, and it redefines ADHD as a non-pathological quality or mode of thought that has both weaknesses and strengths. This way, the book functions as the missing piece of the needle needed to cut through the overblown conceptual balloon that is commonly referred to as ADHD.

ADHD is Not an illness, and Ritalin is Not a cure.

While the COVID-19 epidemic is not an imminent risk to most youngsters, children at present are suffering from a neuropsychiatric scourge that is not understood. Since the emergence of Attention Deficit Disorder some four decades ago, when "as much as 3 percent" of children were deemed to have the condition, which was supposedly chronic in nature, The prevalence of the condition has continued to increase to epidemic levels without any plausible reason for this. With more than 20 percent prevalence in certain countries that are Western-oriented, thousands of children are identified with a permanent diagnosis and given powerful psychoactive drugs (e.g., Ritalin, Adderall).

What if the current consensus on ADHD ?

What if the current consensus on ADHD being the "diabetes of psychosis" is not true? What happens if ADHD is not able to fulfill the requirements for a medical condition that is valid? And what happens if the first-line stimulant drugs for ADHD aren't as effective and safe as we've been advised? In the end, stimulants are powerful substances that penetrate the blood-brain barrier and affect the biochemical functions of the brain, that incredible organ that defines the person we are. Could it be that we're supplying millions of children with harmful stimulants without having a scientifically substantiated reason?

In his lucid, sophisticated, and, in general, brave publication, ADHD is not an illness, and Ritalin Is Not an Effective cure. In The Complete Repudiation of the (alleged) Scientific Consensus, Dr. Ophir answers these concerning questions with an easy-to-follow, step-by-step rebuttal to the medical consensus.

Dr. Ophir's latest book reveals huge evidence in support of the efficacy and safety of stimulant medication and provides the most effective solutions to this raging socio-educational dilemma.However, the book exposes a multitude of credibility gaps in the biomedical consensus that are overriding. It exposes many biases as well as inconsistencies (unjustified explanations) designed to conceal the flaws in the science of consensus. Additionally, they redefine ADHD as a condition that is not pathological and has both weaknesses and strengths. This book is the missing piece of the needle needed to penetrate the overblown theoretical balloon that is commonly referred to as ADHD.

"When I discovered the story was actually Dr. Ophir's debut novel, I could not seem to believe it." He writes with the fluency and rhythm that reflect a veteran writer, meticulously and carefully discovering the truth behind an enduring fable that has been absorbed into our daily lives. Dr. Ophir shows the forensic capabilities of a scientist as well as the writing abilities of an author. The contemporary mythology that Dr. Ophir so brilliantly deconstructs is one of ADHD. What makes his argument so powerful is the fact that he reexamines the core assumptions made by those who promote the ADHD notion to make this sham... He writes with insight, wit, and a profound compassion and empathy for the lives of the young individuals who are diagnosed with or could receive this label. This book is an absolute must-read for anyone who is interested in this subject. It doesn't matter if you're the parent of a child, someone with a diagnosis, a teacher, or a professional working in this mental health field. Every person will learn something worthwhile by taking the time to read this amazing book".

Contents:

  • Personal Prologue: A Late Apology to Queen Sarabi
  • Introduction: Illusory Consensus and Silenced Controversy
  • Part I: Part One: ADHD is not an illness The Step-by-Step Solution to the Idea Theorizing that ADHD is a Legitimate Neuropsychiatric Disorder
    • What Makes (Any) Psychopathology 'Real'? The Philosophical Foundation of the Debate
    • Does ADHD Meet the criteria of Deviance?
    • Does ADHD Meet the criteria for Dysfunction?
    • Does ADHD Meet the criteria for Danger?
    • Does ADHD Meet the criteria of Distress?
    • Is ADHD a neurological Deficit?
    • Interim Summary of Part One: The Benefit of the DoubtPart Two: Ritalin is Not a Cure A Comprehensive Refutation of the Notion That Stimulant Medications Are Effective, Safe, and Morally Justified:
    • What is the Treatment of Choice for ADHD? Introducing Stimulant Medications
    • Are Stimulant Medications Effective in the Short Term?
    • Are Stimulant Medications Effective in the Long Term?
    • What are the "Non-Serious" Safety Concerns of Stimulant Use?
    • What are the Serious Safety Concerns of Stimulant Use?
    • Can We Trust the Biomedical Consensus? Biases and Conflicts of Interest
    • Interim Summary of Part Two: Nothing Like Eyeglasses
  • General Discussion: A Time to Tear Down and a Time to Build
  • Personal Epilogue: A Very Special Flamingo
  • Acknowledgements
  • About the Author
  • Index
コメント
Spark TV content creators EARN 55% of their channel on Spark TV