https://www.selleckchem.com/products/th-257.html
ET outperformed HE in the assessment of VI with respect to detection rates (50% vs. 28.6%; P less then 0.0001), accuracy (82% vs. 59%, P less then 0.0001), and reproducibility (k=0.554 vs. 0.394). No significant differences between ET and HE were observed for other features evaluated. In a poststudy survey, most observers considered the ease and speed of assessment at least equivalent for ET and HE for most prognostic factors, and felt that ET would be feasible as a stand-alone stain in practice. If validated by others, ou
Me gusta
Comentario
Compartir
