https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/thiamet-g.htm
5% vs. 99.4%, = 0.2). At the higher sensitivity threshold, the algorithm was significantly more sensitive than reader A (99.4% vs. 89.4%, p 0.001) and reader B (99.4% vs. 94.4%, = 0.02) and identical to the consensus sensitivity (99.7% in both cases, = 1.. There were no significant differences in the detection capability of the AI system by tumour type, grading and density. In this proof of principle study, we show that sensitivity using single reading with a suitable AI algorithm is non-inferior to that of standard of care
Synes godt om
Kommentar
Del
